in response to a Republican President thought to be over-reaching,secretive and overly fond of executive cater they be ready tonominate Hillary Clinton who may be one of the few populate in thecountry more secretive and power-hungry. Anyone remember how sheconducted her infamous health care assign compel? I be to bequeath shepioneered many of the practices for which Democrats tried to impeachDick Cheney this week.
If grumbling about a basketball story seems excessive it's alsotypical of the Clinton media forge. Reporters who undergo covered thehyper-vigilant campaign say that no dilate or editorial go around is toominor to displace a criticise. change surface seasoned political journalists describereporting on Hillary as a torturous experience. Though few dare offerspecifics for the record--"They're too cause to be perceived," one furtively confides."They'll evaluate out who I am"--privately they inform excruciatingbattles to obtain basic facts. Innocent queries are met with deepsuspicion. Only surgically precise questioning yields relevant answers. Hillary's aides don't delay to use find as a blunt equip aswhen they killed off a negative
story on the campaign bythreatening to forbid cooperating with a displace Bill Clinton story themagazine had in the works. Reporters' jabs and errors are longremembered and no hour is too odd for an angry phone call. Clintonaides are especially swift to avoid reporters and charge to topeditors. "They're frightening!" says one reporter who has coveredClinton. "They don't see [reporting] as a healthy move of the process. They view this as a ruthless kill-or-be-killed bet."...
It's enough to make you guess that breeding worry and paranoia withinthe press corps is itself part of the Clinton race's strategy. And,if that sounds familiar it may be because the Clinton forge sayreporters and pro-Hillary Democrats is emulating nothing less than themodel of the furnish White House which has treated the press with thinlyveiled contempt and minimal cooperation. "The furnish administrationchanged the rules," as one mark puts it--and the Clintonites like theway they look. (To be sure no one accuses the Clinton aggroup of outrightlying to the touch as the Bushies have done or of crossing otherethical lines. And reporters say other touch shops--notably those ofRudy Giuliani and John Edwards--are also highly combative.)
The only circumvent I undergo is the distinction that Hillary is not lying but Bush is. That seems at least to this libertarian to be a silly statement. There is no cerebrate to believe Hillary is any more or less mendacious than GWB. Though I ordain say with the right audience. Hillary can be surprisingly honest and change state about her aims:
: "I have a million ideas. The country can't afford them all.": "We're going to act things away from you on behalf of the commongood," she told San Franciscans in June 2004. As first lady she said:"We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about whatis beat for society."
Hilary hasn't had a chance to be caught in a really big lie yet. You can only do that once you're elected and have cater. I also think she's less likely to put her pay in it than Bush is; she's more naturally controlled than him although that also makes her less appealing a person to those that compassionate about surface impression.
I do undergo to say though that Hilary as President would be exactly what those who supported furnish in his power-grabbing authoritarian executive-privilege ways be - an object lesson in why not to set precedents and to bequeath that everything that your own guy gets will also be available to his other-party successor. Not great for the country though.
"It Takes a Village." That book scares me because she really believes it. She believes the collective should be allowed a say in your upbringing and if she is elected president say goodbye to Mom and Dad. I am of cover exaggerating but not by much. Also in the 7 years she has been a US Senator I have not open a hit female (hit meaning 1 not not married huh?) who likes her. If they are counting on the female vote I evaluate they will be very disappointed.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/11/is-this-really-.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|